|
|
Post by Commissioner Erick on Oct 28, 2017 13:14:14 GMT -5
Right now I have overall rating evaluation based on AI, not pure ratings. As a result, statistics are a component for actual ratings.
Also, I have rating evaluation relative to all players, not just relative to players of the same position.
How does everybody feel about these features?
|
|
|
|
Post by TorontoGM_Joe on Oct 28, 2017 14:46:41 GMT -5
I would prefer to keep the ratings as they are now
|
|
|
|
Post by torontogm on Nov 2, 2017 23:30:28 GMT -5
Personally I like "ratings only", as I always look at performance as well when evaluating, so it's nice to have a neutral/clear representation of ratings as well.
Also, never been a big fan of "in relation to all players", as players' ratings change when you change their position no matter what. So you still have to have to take that in to account and when comparing two different positions. To me, it really doesn't help.
|
|
|
|
Post by tigersgm_Steve on Nov 3, 2017 20:39:36 GMT -5
I'm good with what we have and probably less confusing to keep the same program in place.
|
|
