|
Ratings
Jul 22, 2017 11:01:55 GMT -5
Post by Commissioner Erick on Jul 22, 2017 11:01:55 GMT -5
There's been some debate, it's time to put this out there to a vote. What ratings do we want.
Only think I don't want is very detailed numbers. I play in a 1-100 league with 20-80 replacing stars and the rating system doesn't do it for me. I want as small numbers as possible, though 1-5 may be too small.
So the options will be.
1-10 1-20 2-8 1-5
|
|
|
Post by NYMets_Nige on Jul 22, 2017 11:06:08 GMT -5
1-10, I can cope with that. Nearly every league that I've been in with 20-80 I've ended up quitting, I just don't like the whole concept of it
|
|
|
Ratings
Jul 22, 2017 11:08:31 GMT -5
Post by Commissioner Erick on Jul 22, 2017 11:08:31 GMT -5
If there were a 20-80 in groups of 5, I would have allowed that. There's something different about seeing a 35 go to a 40 then 45 then back to 40 that's better for me than seeing a 34 to go to a 39 then 43 then 41.
|
|
|
Ratings
Jul 22, 2017 12:22:29 GMT -5
Post by alextb on Jul 22, 2017 12:22:29 GMT -5
1-10
|
|
|
Ratings
Apr 20, 2018 12:27:29 GMT -5
Post by strzepeksc on Apr 20, 2018 12:27:29 GMT -5
As posted in SLACK:
Baseball America PECOTA ratings which OOTP bases ratings on is the 20-80 scale
The accepted standard ! I feel we should be utilizing it
|
|